- Sep 12, 2024
-
-
- Nov 23, 2022
-
-
- Sep 09, 2022
-
-
Chi-Tuân Pham authored
to prevent from possible negative values under square roots
-
- Oct 26, 2020
-
-
Florent Taccone authored
-
- Jul 15, 2020
-
-
Fabien Souille authored
-
- Jul 02, 2020
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
Genric function (via interface) were created for parallel function that were had the same functionality but not the same argument types/number. For example p_dmax and p_imax are now p_max For example p_dsum and p_isum are now p_sum
-
- Jun 04, 2020
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
-
- Aug 22, 2018
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
-
- Jul 04, 2018
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
- the velocities on one side of the culvert are taken from the flow but were taken always at the bottom - now they are taken at the elevation of the culvert on that side, in the same way as for the tracers - update the culvert and bergenmeersen reference files
-
- Oct 25, 2017
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
- new parameters in the culverts data file were added to set: - the angles between the inflow and outflow pipes with the horizontal and with the vertical; - the user choice regarding the automatic calculation of the horizontal angle based on the mesh; - the culvert formulation 1 is now adapted to the case of circular sections, like the formulation 2; - the results for the siphon slightly change because in the case the outflow is actually partially unsubmerged (which may be a small mistake in the original setup).
-
- Sep 13, 2017
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
- In the previous commit only one flow direction was treated. Besides, Pierre-Louis Ligier suggested to use the outlet's upper elevation for the calculation of the discharge instead of the outlet's water level in order to prevent flow rate overestimations, in particular in the case of a falling jet at the outlet. This choice may be discussed but is implemented here. - The printing of the flow rates through the culverts in the listing now only happen at the listing printout frequency.
-
- Sep 11, 2017
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
This print was accidentally removed at revision 7842 among the introduction of the new culvert formulation.
-
Agnès Leroy authored
The formulation 1 for culverts did not fall back to the siphon formulation. This impacts the bridge test-case of TELEMAC-2D which now presents lower values of flow rate underneath the bridge.
-
- Jul 18, 2017
-
-
Sébastien Bourban authored
[src]Algorithmic Differentiation: Merged revision(s) from branches/foxface/, including bug fixes, a modified symbolic solver and some cosmetic changes.
-
- Mar 24, 2017
-
-
Sébastien Bourban authored
-
- Mar 15, 2017
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
-
- Dec 17, 2016
-
-
RIEHME Jan authored
* except in DREGDESIM NESTOR MASCARET
-
- Sep 11, 2016
-
-
Sébastien Bourban authored
-
- Sep 01, 2016
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
- feature #282 of the CUE - the reference files for the two test-cases are unchanged
-
- Jul 24, 2016
-
-
Sébastien Bourban authored
-
- Jul 05, 2016
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
- add the culvert modelling in TELEMAC-3D - add a new formulation for culverts in TELEMAC-2D and 3D, proposed and tested at Flanders Hydraulics (contact: Sven Smolders, sven.smolders@mow.vlaanderen.be) - this commit corresponds to the merge of the branch balloonfish at revision 7837 with the trunk
-
- Jun 30, 2016
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
[feature #347] Deallocatting array at the of telemac2d (Which includes removing all common/lu/lng now using USE DECLARATIONS_SPECIAL instead)
-
- Aug 27, 2015
-
-
Agnès Leroy authored
-
- Jun 01, 2015
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
-
- Jan 29, 2014
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
[all] Cleanup of the sources file : Removing tabulation transforming do label label continue in do enddo [all] Adapting code for Fortran 2003 Standard must pass compiler option (-std=f2003 for gnu compiler) [makefile] Moving list of files in makefile.am [python] Adding support for section files (partel)
-
- Jul 04, 2013
-
-
Yoann Audouin authored
-
- Jun 13, 2013
-
-
Christophe COULET authored
Telemac2D : dynamic allocation of variables for weirs and preparation of future version of weir description
-
- Apr 25, 2013
-
-
Christophe COULET authored
This appear only when the discharge becomes equal to 0 (in such case, the value of SECT is 0) but due to relaxation, the effective discharge take in account for the computation could be different of 0 and then the computation of velocities crash. Now, the value of SECT was saved in memory and in such case, we use the previous value. I'm not sure is we should make a relaxation on the section...
-
- Jul 27, 2012
-
-
Jean-Michel Hervouet authored
-
- Jul 19, 2012
-
-
Jean-Michel Hervouet authored
-
- May 25, 2012
-
-
Jean-Michel Hervouet authored
-